Personalmente mi trovo concorde con la decisione, in quanto, la "lotta" di questo blog su tale vicenda è iniziata nel 2010 e, dopo 4 anni, seppur con grande ritardo, è stata fatta giustizia.
Articolo contestato dalla FIA è il 3.15 di cui vi riporto l'estratto.
3.15 Aerodynamic influence :
With the exception of the driver adjustable bodywork described in Article 3.18 (in addition to minimal parts solely associated with its actuation) and the ducts described in Article 11.4, any specific part of the car influencing its aerodynamic performance :
a) Must comply with the rules relating to bodywork.
b) Must be rigidly secured to the entirely sprung part of the car (rigidly secured means not having any degree of freedom).
c) Must remain immobile in relation to the sprung part of the car.
Any device or construction that is designed to bridge the gap between the sprung part of the car and the ground is prohibited under all circumstances.
No part having an aerodynamic influence and no part of the bodywork, with the exception of the skid block in 3.13 above, may under any circumstances be located below the reference plane.
With the exception of the parts necessary for the adjustment described in Article 3.18, any car system, device or procedure which uses driver movement as a means of altering the aerodynamic characteristics of the car is prohibited.
Ecco il comunicato della FIA sull'indagine che hanno fatto sulle ali Red Bull:
Comunicato sulle squalifiche di entrambi i piloti
Alcuni articoli di questo blog in qui veniva evidenziata la flessione.
http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2011/03/ali-flessibili-stagione-2011.html
http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2012/02/lala-anteriore-della-red-bull-flette.html
Pacman
Nostradamus
Magical Cat Adventure
Snake